Forecasting of Revenues
Revenue
from a mine is determined from 2 essential factors (or for that
matter in any business). The first is the quantity of Saleable
product produced and sold. The Quantity produced will be determined
as per the mine plan for the particular mine. For the purpose of
valuation the full mine plan till the end of mine life must be
determined. It is essential to model the year wise (or quarter wise
or month wise as may be possible) production quantities as any
variations in the level of production is likely to have an impact on
the cash flows of the project and the NPV.
A
detailed long-term production plan for the mine is essential for the
purpose of determining the cash flow forecasts for any mine or a
project. Few key points that are critical to determination of the
cash flows is to account for
- the appropriate losses (handling and processing losses).
- Variation in grades year on year – which will result in variation in the final production levels of saleable product
- Variation in strip ratios over the mine life – this will result in substantial variations in the cost of mining over the life of mine.
The
Second factor in the determination of Revenues is the Selling Price.
As a thumb rule, producers/miners remain one of the worst forecasters
of the future market price of metals. Though neither have the
analysts done any better in doing the same. There are certain
alternatives available for forecasting the selling prices for the
metals/intermediates/ore.
Consensus
forecast - One of the
safest and easily defendable assumptions is to take a consensus of a
number of analyst’s forecasts. Either mean or mode can be taken or
mean after removing the outliers can also be taken as a safe
assumption. I personally do not recommend too much of “cleaning”
the data to remove outliers as it tends to be get biased in either
direction depending on the person doing the cleaning.
The
consensus forecast for exchange traded metals are available on
Bloomberg and Reuters. Reuters also runs a series of half yearly
surveys of forecasts for traded metals. Other alternatives to get
consensus forecasts are to service providers such as consensus
economics or to collate the forecasts individually from the research
reports/data sites of each analyst/forecaster though its an extremely
tedious exercise and prone to selection bias.
Economic
Forecast – A detailed economic
forecast for the price of the metal/ore can be drawn based on
- Supply demand situation
- Proxy pricing with alternatives
- Cost curve analysis – marginal cost of production
While
these methods constitute entire subjects unto themselves, we will
look at these in brief. Metals are linked to the economy. Demand for
all metals is driven primarily arising out of consumption patterns
and growth. Consumption is metal specific (due specific usage of each
metal) but is driven by consumerism and infrastructure spends in
different proportions. The economic forecasts will begin with a
forecast of the economic growth of the world economy and in
particular the major regions of consumption, followed by sectoral
forecasts for consumption of the finished product and backward
calculation being down to the level of consumption of primary metal.
This alongwith the forecast of secondary metal consumption (scrap
etc) and supply will provide a full forecast of the demand situation
for primary metal.
On the
supply
side of the equation, a forecast of mine
wise production (this data is generally collated by data suppliers
like Brookhunt( for base metals) etc ) from existing as well as
planned projects needs to be drawn. There are generally variations
in the year wise production levels from existing mines, as well as
delays in projects, project cancellations and extensions of mine life
which all need to be factored in. Many analysts such as Brookhunt
tend to classify projects as probable, possible etc to draw a
probability based expected production level and supply for the
future.
Proxy
pricing – while in itself it is not a
complete forecast, it also forms one of the inputs a jigsaw puzzle
(which hitherto no one has solved entirely) of forecasting the
pricing. Proxy pricing forms one of the reference points to ensure we
are not straying too far from what might be the reality. It is also a
powerful tool for derivatives of primary metals such as deriving a
petrol price forecast on basis of Crude oil forecast.
Cost
curve analysis is also one of the major
inputs on the supply side. Cost curve is a chart of cumulative
production vs. the cost of production. It is essentially a sorted
list of all producers from low cost to high cost. The supply from
mines is highly dependent on the current cost of production and the
price of the finished product. There is substantial variation in the
cost of production from various mines on account of intrinsic factors
– technology, strip ratios, logistics costs etc which cannot be in
most cases reduced with reduction in the selling price. As mines
begin to run cash losses, they tend to shut down the operations
resulting in drop in supply. Also with change in prices, the
investments into capex and new projects tend to dry out resulting in
reduced supply in the years to come. Generally, a baseline price for
all commodities in the long term is drawn at 75-80 percentile
position of the cost curve. This baseline price can be viewed as a
long-term forecast for the price of the particular metal. Any drop in
price below this level will generally tend to start bleeding even the
efficient suppliers and will result in noticeable drop in production
levels balancing the supply demand situation. Suppliers such as
Brookhunt tend to provide cost curves (with forecasts/sensitivity) at
a fee of course.
Flat
forecast – One alternative for assumption
for sale price is to assume a flat single price, usually the current
price. While this may seem unscientific, it is a reasonable
assumption to make if the cost of inputs and the output have a strong
correlation over a period of time. It also makes sense to have a
sensitivity built into the financial model for running a flat price
forecast at long-term price levels.
No comments:
Post a Comment